Despite the deluge of crypto ETF applications landing at the SEC throughout January, one of the most consequential filings wasn’t a request for permission to launch a fund.
Nasdaq filed a proposed rule change seeking to create and redeem units of BlackRock’s iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) in-kind instead of in cash, the latter method being the way all crypto ETF creation and redemption units are currently structured.
If permitted, the transition would be highly consequential and obviously welcomed by issuers, and all other counterparties involved.
It’s because utilization of the in-kind mechanism for unit creation and redemption avoids inefficiencies and cost implications inherent in converting the underlying asset into and out of cash; which authorized participants are obliged to, when the cash methodology is applied.
A pivot would also be another embarrassment for the SEC, given the Commission’s officially unexplained, yet tacit conditioning of approval for spot Bitcoin, and subsequently, spot Ether ETFs, on the cash create/redeem mechanism.
There are numerous theories as to why the SEC favoured ‘in cash’, vs., in-kind. They’re less central now; though you can find more context in our CFB Compact piece on the same topic linked below.
More importantly, if approved, the potential for additional impetus to allocations is obvious. Particularly from the removal of friction faced by all institutional participants. They currently need to explain to clients why crypto ETP redemptions differ from those for just about any other funds they advise on.
On a common sense basis alone (which of course is seldom the sole consideration) approval ought to be favoured.
It's a sentiment echoed by Marco Santori, who was Chief Legal Officer of Kraken for several years, and has now transitioned to an advisory role at the group, amid reports he's in the running to be the next CFTC chair.
In the clip below, from a recent episode of the CFB Talks Digital Assets, Santori notes there are no sound operational reasons why cash create/redeem was prescribed for crypto ETFs, in the face of the widely shared view that it's the sub-optimal option.
Given the discretionary nature of approval probabilities, as usual, caution is advised. And whilst the SEC’s typical maximum 45-day initial review period is now widely known, it’s worth noting reviews officially begin after publication of proposed rule changes in the Federal Register. As of the time of writing, it does not appear the submission has been published in the register. At best, this delays any switch to in-kind for several more weeks yet.
Click below to catch the full episode of our podcast featuring Marco Santori on YouTube, or go here for other platform options.
As we've noted several times over the years, one way to assess the maturity of digital asset markets and products, from an institutional perspective at least, is the degree to which facilities available to institutional and capital market participants in traditional asset classes can be matched by those available to crypto participants.
As such, the launch of several Bitcoin capital-protected exchange traded products by Calamos in recent weeks is a case in point:
Billed as the first ever downside-protected Bitcoin ETFs, the suite also represents the first launch of digital asset products by Calamos, which reported some $40 billion in assets under management (AuM) at the end of 2024.
Calamos's BTC funds join a broader suite of products that include mutual, closed-ended, UCITS and other structures.
Still, the 50-plus year old group is best known for its deep bench of structured protection ETFs, and its new crypto funds are based on the same framework.
CBOJ, CBXJ and CBTJ provide a sliding scale of combined downside protection vs. rising upside caps, excluding fees, respectively: 100%/11.65%, 90%/29.15%, and 80%/51.50%.
These ETFs integrate our regulated CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant (BRRNY) as their BTC reference price.
In common with Calamos’s other structured products, its Bitcoin ETFs are designed to capture returns to a pre-defined cap, whilst protecting against a given level of losses – so long as the ETFs are held for one year.
As such, for the first time, the funds provide a vital facility for a broad cohort of risk-averse investors looking for ways to gain exposure to Bitcoin returns via an exchange traded product, yet unwilling, as yet, to countenance Bitcoin’s intermittently enhanced drawdown risk.
Again, these ETFs utilize capital protection structures that would be recognizable to anyone familiar with typical downside protected products.
The majority of Calamos's downside protected fund assets comprise of U.S. Treasurys.
For their Bitcoin products, the fixed income holdings are combined with returns from a bull call spread in Cboe Mini Bitcoin US ETF Index Options (MBTX).
Example
Strategies like these may look like complex financial engineering – and of course in themselves, they're certainly sophisticated - but relative to the kind of tools available to participants in traditional capital markets, they’re bread and butter.
So, Calamos’ structured protection Bitcoin ETFs represent a further integration of crypto into mainstream markets.
Following on from CME Group’s Bitcoin Friday futures (BFF) launch last year, and Robinhood Markets’ plans to offer BFF, plus other CME crypto products to retail clients, the world’s largest derivatives venue operator now confirms access will start rolling out to eligible Robinhood customers in coming weeks.
Bitcoin Friday futures are the first CME Bitcoin contract to settle to our CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate – New York Variant (BRRNY), referencing Bitcoin’s 4 PM New York Time price, as opposed to all other CME BTC options and futures, which settle to BTC’s 4 PM London Time price, AKA BRR.
Further notable developments are embedded in CME’s plans for February.
Pending regulatory approval, CME also announced that options on BFF would become available to trade towards the end of February.
In another apparent convergence to retail-oriented characteristics aligned with the Robinhood rollout, the new options will also be the first financially settled (essentially, 'cash-settled') CME crypto contracts, with expiries available on each business day.
CME Bitcoin, Ether, Micro Bitcoin (MBT) and Micro Ether options and futures, primarily aimed at capital markets-scale traders, are all physically settled.
Still, CME executives suggest BFF would be attractive to a broad range of trading capacities, noting the smaller size of BFF (1/50th BTC vs. 5 BTC for regular CME BTC, and 1/10th for MBT) weekly flexibility, and now, the ability to manage risk with daily expiring BFF options.
"Building on the success of our Bitcoin Friday futures, the smaller size of these contracts, along with daily expiries, offer market participants a capital-efficient toolset to effectively adjust their bitcoin exposure."
Giovanni Vicioso, CME Group Global Head of Cryptocurrency Products
Meanwhile, with 775,000 BFF contracts traded since their launch on September 29th, 2024, and an average daily volume approaching 10,000, BFF continues to look like the CME’s most successful crypto product launch ever.
The upcoming addition of Robinhood traders to the BRR liquidity complex implies increasing benefits will continue to accrue for all users.
Particularly now that the complex includes around 60% of all U.S. Bitcoin ETF assets under reference, equating to the key issuers striking NAV to BRRNY.
All told, participants can expect increasing stability, transparency and choice around the orderbook spread, underpinning replicability, and, in turn, near-perfect tracking for product providers, plus minimal slippage for traders.
CF Benchmarks’ recent report ‘A Factor Model for Digital Assets’ has now demonstrated the existence of ‘classic’ factors, like Momentum, Liquidity, Value and others, within the crypto asset class, beyond any reasonable doubt.
For the clearest possible exploration of our research, the CFB podcast team were stoked to welcome back CF Benchmarks quant and product manager Cristian Isac.
Listen in to their chat to 5x your understanding of Crypto Factors!
Key points discussed include ....
All in all, this episode should be essential listening for quants, portfolio managers, and investment professionals in general; anyone, in fact, serious about the evolution of digital asset investing.
By Mark Pilipczuk - Research Analyst, and Gabe Selby, CFA - Head of Research
To read the complete report, click here, or click below to download a PDF copy.
The information contained within is for educational and informational purposes ONLY. It is not intended nor should it be considered an invitation or inducement to buy or sell any of the underlying instruments cited including but not limited to cryptoassets, financial instruments or any instruments that reference any index provided by CF Benchmarks Ltd. This communication is not intended to persuade or incite you to buy or sell security or securities noted within. Any commentary provided is the opinion of the author and should not be considered a personalised recommendation. Please contact your financial adviser or professional before making an investment decision.
Note: Some of the underlying instruments cited within this material may be restricted to certain customer categories in certain jurisdictions.
CF Benchmarks
Gabriel Selby
CF Benchmarks